While
reading the student, I could not help but feel that Chekhov’s use of language
evokes much feeling and conveys the emotions of the narrator, Ivan. Chekhov
skillfully manages to mix in emotion within his dry, objective, and somewhat
journalistic tone. The shift in his descriptions and sentence structure echoes
the shift in Ivan’s emotions, which speaks of the main theme of the short story.
“The Student” starts out with images of
desolate bleakness. The description of nature is predominant in the first part
of the story. “Something alive droned pitifully with a sound like blowing into
an empty bottle,” and “a penetrating wind blew inappropriately from the east,” culminating
into a feeling of cheerlessness, remoteness, and loneliness. The language is crude and laconic. The following mentioning of the figures of the past, Ivan the Terrible, Peter, and Rurik arouse the thought that this desolate gloom is a chronic state. It seems to speak of misery as being a integral and perpetual part of human nature. "The same darkness, the same feeling of oppression - all these had existed, did exist and would exist, and the lapse of a thousand years would make life no better." This powerful description of desolation and depression dominates the first part of the story.
Then, right after this bleak introduction and insight into the misery of humans, Ivan encounters two widows and tells them of the (rather simplified) Biblical narrative of Peter and Jesus. Religion was a dominant factor in 19th century, and it seems that after being depressed after his rather dooming insight, Ivan and his young 22-year-old self wanted to relate and share the suffering of the past with someone. To gather sympathy of the bleakness of life? To garner reverence for his knowledge? Perhaps. But what he gets is an emotional outburst from the two women. This response from the widows ignites joy from Ivan, as powerful as the depression portrayed in the beginning of the story. The rhythm of the language brings out this happiness of the student who learned something new - the response and connection of those suffering in the present to those who suffered in the past. The last paragraph is composed of one thick paragraph, with thoughts flowing freely from the river by the ferry to the chief thing in human life in a single sentence, Ivan excited to share his discovery. There is no evident logic and the last paragraph gives an ambiguous conclusion but it hopes for a happier future.
Chekhov mingled the past and present by the subtle parallelisms of Peter's betrayal and the setting surrounding the two widows. As he shows, sufferings and misery are indeed constant. However, they also have meaning and significance enough to evoke emotions in the present, which makes suffering have some meaning and significance. This rather strange, somewhat paradoxical theme continues on to the language of the conclusion. The last paragraph juxtaposes the ominous image of the "cold, crimson sunset" and a beacon of hope, the "narrow streak of light." Chekhov said that "The Student" was his favorite "optimistic" work. The final notes of the story focus not on the coldness and dejectedness of the suffering, but resound of enchanment, happiness, and beauty. Apart from whether this story is realism or not, Chekhov's mastery of language to convey a deep message about of suffering and joy itself is simply amazing.
Excellent, balanced, consistent post. You cover a bit of every element without focusing too much on what can be considered "real" or not, and you express your appreciation of Chekhov's skill and craft. Big things come in small packages in this story (though any biblical allusion automatically signals "heavy" thinking at times). Multiple reads uncover more gold nuggets, and I can personally identify with some of Ivan's musings about how things connect. I think we all can. Chekhov does an amazing job of getting as much as possible out of this seemingly insignificant "plotless" story. Is it a true slice of Russian peasant life at the time? Maybe. Maybe not. Whatever it is, it is a sum greater than its parts.
ReplyDelete